1. Beadle, G.W., A gene for supernumerary mitosis during spore development in Zea mays, Science, 1929, vol. 50, pp. 406–407.
2. Beadle, G.W., Genetic and cytological studies of a Mendelian asynaptic in Zea mays, Cornell Agric. Exp. Sta. Mem., 1930, vol. 129, pp. 1–23.
3. Rhoades, M.M., Genetic control of chromosomal behavior, Maize Genet. Coop. Newslett., 1956, vol. 30, pp. 38–48.
4. Golubovskaya, I.N., Genetic control of meiosis, Int. Rev. Cytol., 1979, vol. 58, pp. 247–290.
5. Golubovskaya, I.N., Meiosis in maize: mei-genes and conception of genetic control of meiosis, Adv. Genet., 1989, vol. 26, pp. 149–192.
6. Kaul, M.L. and Murthy, T.G., Mutant genes affecting higher plant meiosis, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1985, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 449–466.
7. Hamant, O., Ma, H., and Cande, W.Z., Genetics of meiotic prophase I in plants, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2006, vol. 57, pp. 267–302.
8. Mercier, R. and Grelon, M., Meiosis in plants: ten years of gene discovery, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2008, vol. 120, no. 34, pp. 281–290.
9. Cande, W.Z., Golubovskaya, I., Wang, C.J.R., et al., Meiotic genes and meiosis in maize, in Handbook of Maize, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009, pp. 353–375.
10. Cande, W.Z., Freeling, M., and Golubovskaya, I., the life of a geneticist studing meiosis, Genetics, 2011, vol. 188, pp. 491–498.
11. Bogdanov, Yu.F., A talented researcher of the genetic control of meiosis: to the 75th anniversary of I.N. Golubovskaya, Vavilov. Zh. Genet. Sel., 2014, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 228–234.
12. Golubovskaya, I.N., Avalkina, N.A., and Sheridan, W.F., Effect of several meiotic mutations on female meiosis in maize, Dev. Genet., 1992, vol. 13, pp. 411–424.
13. Golubovskaya, I.N., Grebennikova, Z.K., Avalkina, N.A., et al., The role of ameiotic 1 gene in the initiation of meiosis and subsequent meiotic events in maize, Genetics, 1993, vol. 135, pp. 1151–1166.
14. Golubovskaya I.N., Avalkina N.A., Sheridan W.F., New insight into the role of the maize ameiotic I locus, Genetics, 1997, vol. 147, pp. 1339–1350.
15. Sheridan, W.F., Avalkina, N.A., Shamrov, I.I., et al., The mac1 gene: controlling the commitment to the meiotic pathway in maize, Genetics, 1996, vol. 142, pp. 1009–1020.
16. Sheridan, W.F., Golubeva, E.A., Abrhamova, L.I., et al., The mac1 mutation alters the developmental fate of the hypodermal cells and their cellular progeny in the maize anther, Genetics, 1999, vol. 153, pp. 993–941.
17. Golubovskaya, I.N., Harper, L.C., Pawlowski, W.P., et al., The pam1 gene is required for meiotic bouquet formation and efficient homologous synapsis in maize (Zea mays L.), Genetics, 2002, vol. 162, pp. 1979–1993.
18. Golubovskaya, I.N., Hamant, O., Timofejeva, L., et al., Alleles of afd1 dissect REC8 functions during meiotic prophase I, J. Cell Sci., 2006, vol. 119,pp. 3306–3315.
19. Hamant, O., Golubovskaya, I., Meeley, R., et al., A REC8-dependent plant Shugoshin is required for maintenance of centromeric cohesion during meiosis and has no mitotic functions, Curr. Biol., 2005, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 948–954.
20. Pawlowski, W.P., Golubovskaya, I.N., and Cande, W.Z., Altered nuclear distribution of recombination protein RAD51 in maize mutants suggests the involvement of RAD51 in meiotic homology recognition, Plant Cell, 2003, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1807–1816.
21. Pawlowski, W.P., Golubovskaya, I.N., Timofejeva, L., et al., Coordination of meiotic recombination, pairing, and synapsis by PHS1, Science, 2004, vol. 303, pp. 89–92.
22. Pawlowski, W.P., Wang, C.-J.R., Golubovskaya, I.N., et al., Maize AMEIOTIC1 is essential for multiple early meiotic processes and likely required for the initiation of meiosis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2009, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 3603–3608.
23. Wang, C.-J.R., Nan, G.-L., Kelliher, T., et al., Maize multiple archesporial cells 1 (mac1), an ortholog of rice TDL1A, modulates cell proliferation and identity in early anther development, Development, 2012, vol. 139, no. 14, pp. 2594–2603.
24. Glover, J., Grelon, M., Craig, S., et al., Cloning and characterization of MS5 from Arabidopsis: a gene critical in male meiosis, Plant J., 1998, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 345—356.
25. Caryl, A.P., Armstrong, S.J., Jones, G.H., et al., A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1, Chromosoma, 2000, vol. 109, nos. 1–2, pp. 62–71.
26. Motamayor, J.C., Vezon, D., Bajon, C., et al., Switch (swi1), an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant affected in the female meiotic switch, Sex. Plant Reprod., 2000, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 209–218.
27. Osakabe, K., Yoshioka, T., Ichikawa, H., et al., Molecular cloning and characterization of RAD51-like genes from Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant Mol. Biol., 2002, vol. 50, pp. 71–81.
28. Higgins, J.D., Sanchez-Moran, E., Armstrong, S.J., et al., The Arabidopsis synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for chromosome synapsis and normal fidelity of crossing over, Genes Dev., 2005, vol. 19, pp. 2488–2500.
29. Mercier, R., Vezon, D., Bullier, E., et al., SWITCH1 (SWI1): a novel protein required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and for bivalent formaRUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS Vol. 54 No. 4 2018 GENETIC CONTROL OF MEIOSIS IN PLANTS 399 tion at meiosis, Genes Dev., 2001, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 1859–1871.
30. Mercier, R., Armstrong, S.J., Horlow, C., et al., The meiotic protein SWI1 is required for axial element formation and recombination initiation in Arabidopsis, Development, 2003, vol. 130, no. 14, pp. 3309–3318.
31. Zamariola, L., De Storme, N., Vannerum, K., et al., SHUGOSHINs and PATRONUS protect meiotic centromere cohesion in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J., 2014, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 782–794.
32. Nonomura, K.-I., Miyoshi, K., Eiguchi, M., et al., The MSP1 gene is necessary to restrict the number of cells entering into male and female sporogenesis and to initiate anther wall formation in rice, Plant Cell, 2003, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1728–1739.
33. Nonomura, K.I., Nakano, M., Murata, K., et al., An insertional mutation in the rice PAIR2 gene, the ortholog of Arabidopsis ASY1, results in a defect in homologous chromosome pairing during meiosis, Mol. Genet. Genomics, 2004, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 121–129.
34. Nonomura, K., Morohoshi, A., Nakano, M., et al., A germ cell–specific gene of the ARGONAUTE family is essential for the progression of premeiotic mitosis and meiosis during sporogenesis in rice, Plant Cell, 2007, vol. 19, pp. 2583–2594.
35. Wang, M., Tang, D., Wang, K., et al., OsSGO1 maintains synaptonemal complex stabilization in addition to protecting centromeric cohesion during rice meiosis, Plant J., 2011, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 583–594.
36. Luo Q., Li Y., Shen Y. et al. Ten years of gene discovery for meiotic event control in rice, J. Genet. Genomics, 2014, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 125–137.
37. Sosnikhina, S.P., Fedotova, Y.S., Smirnov, V.G., et al., Meiotic mutants of rye Secale cereale L.: 1. Synaptic mutant sy1, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1992, vol. 84, nos. 7–8, pp. 979–985.
38. Sosnikhina, S.P., Fedotova, Y.S., Smirnov, V.G., et al., The study of genetic control of meiosis in rye, Russ. J. Genet., 1994, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1043–1056.
39. Sosnikhina, S.P., Mikhailova, E.I., Tikholiz, O.A., et al., Meiotic mutations in rye Secale cereale L., Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2005, vol. 109, nos. 1–3, pp. 215–220.
40. Sosnikhina, S.P., Mikhailova, E.I., Tikholiz, O.A., et al., Genetic collection of meiotic mutants of rye Secale cereale L., Russ. J. Genet., 2005, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11177-005- 0202-x.
41. Sosnikhina, S.P., Mikhailova, E.I., Tikholiz, O.A., et al., Expression and inheritance of a desynaptic phenotype with impaired homologous synapsis in rye, Russ. J. Genet., 2007, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795407100146.
42. Sosnikhina, S.P., Mikhailova, E.I., Tsvetkova, N.V., et al., Impairment of homologous chromosome synapsis in meiosis in rye Secale cereale L. caused by a recessive mutation of the sy18 gene, Russ. J. Genet., 2009, vol. 45, article 1385.
43. Lovtsyus, A.V., Dolmatovich, T.V., Mikhailova, E.I., et al., Obtaining double mutants for synaptic genes sy1 and sy9 in rye and their study by means of molecular cytogenetic methods, Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ., Ser. 3: Biol., 2009, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 47–56.
44. Mikhailova, E.I., Lovtsyus, A.V., and Sosnikhina, S.P., Some features of meiosis key events in rye and its synaptic mutants, Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1210–1213. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795410100170.
45. Bogdanov, Y.F., Fedotova, Y.S., Sosnikhina, S.P., et al., Bar- and thorn-like abnormalities in synaptonemal complex of a mutant rye, Genome, 1998, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 284–288.
46. Mikhailova, E.I., Sosnikhina, S.P., Kirillova, G.A., et al., Nuclear dispositions of subtelomeric and pericentromeric chromosomal domains during meiosis in asynaptic mutants of rye (Secale cereale L.), J. Cell Sci., 2001, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1875–1882.
47. Jenkins, G., Mikhailova, E.I., Langdon, T., et al., Strategies for the study of meiosis in rye, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2005, vol. 109, pp. 221–227.
48. Mikhailova, E.I., Phillips, D., Sosnikhina, S.P., et al., Molecular assembly of meiotic proteins Asy1 and Zyp1 and pairing promiscuity in rye (Secale cereale L.) and its synaptic mutant sy10, Genetics, 2006, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 1247–1258.
49. Phillips, D., Mikhailova, E.I., Timofejeva, L., et al., Dissecting meiosis of rye using translational proteomics, Ann. Bot., 2008, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 873–880.
50. Malyshev, S.V., Dolmatovich, T.V., Voilokov, A.V., et al., Molecular genetic mapping of the sy1 and sy9 asynaptic genes in rye (Secale cereale L.) using microsatellite and isozyme markers, Russ. J. Genet., 2009, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1444–1449. https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S1022795409120060.
51. Golubtsov, S.V., Sosnikhina, S.P., Iordanskaya, I.V., et al., Semisterile meiotic mutant sy11 with heterologous chromosome synapsis in rye Secale cereale L., Russ. J. Genet., 2010, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795410060086.
52. Dolmatovich, T.V., Malyshev, S.V., Sosnikhina, S.P., et al., Mapping of meiotic genes in rye (Secale cereale L.): Localization of sy18 mutation with impaired homologous synapsis using microsatellite markers, Russ. J. Genet., 2013, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 411–416. https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S1022795413040030.
53. Dolmatovich, T.V., Malyshev, S.V., Sosnikhina, S.P., et al., Mapping of meiotic genes in rye (Secale cereale L.): localization of sy19 mutation, impairing homologous synapsis, by means of isozyme and microsatellite markers, Russ. J. Genet., 2013, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795413030058.
54. Simanovsky, S.A., Matveevsky, S.N., Iordanskaya, I.V., et al., Spiral cores of synaptonemal complex lateral elements at the diplotene stage in rye include the ASY1 protein, Russ. J. Genet., 2014, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1107–1111. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795414100111.
55. Havekes, F.W.J., de Jong, J.H., Heyting, C., et al., Synapsis and chiasma formation in four meiotic mutants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), Chromosome Res., 1994, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 315–325.
56. Havekes, F.W., de Jong, J.H., and Heyting, C., Comparative analysis of female and male meiosis in three meiotic mutants of tomato, Genome, 1997, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 879–886.
57. Qiao, H., Offenberg, H.H., and Anderson, L.K., Altered distribution of MLH1 foci is associated with changes in cohesins and chromosome axis compaction in an asynaptic mutant of tomato, Chromosoma, 2012, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 291–305.
58. Lundqvist, U., Franckowiak, J.D., and Konishi, T., New and revised descriptions of barley genes, Barley Genet. Newslett., 1997, vol. 26, pp. 22–516.
59. Barakate, A., Higgins, J.D., Vivera, S., et al., The synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for imposition of meiotic crossovers in barley, Plant Cell, 2014, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 729–740.
60. Colas, I., Macaulay, M., Higgins, J.D., et al., A spontaneous mutation in MutL-Homolog 3 (HvMLH3) affects synapsis and crossover resolution in the barley desynaptic mutant des10, New Phytol., 2016, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 693–707.
61. Feldman, M., The effect of chromosome 5B, 5D, and 5A on chromosomal pairing in Triticum aestivum, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1966, vol. 55, pp. 1447–1453.
62. Martinez-Perez, E., Shaw, P., and Moore, G., The Ph1 locus is needed to ensure specific somatic and meiotic centromere association, Nature, 2001, vol. 411, pp. 204–207.
63. Jenkins, G. and Jimenez, G., Genetic control of synapsis and recombination in Lolium amphidiploids, Chromosoma, 1995, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 164–168.
64. Moore, G., Meiosis in allopolyploids—the importance of “Teflon” chromosomes, Trends Genet., 2002, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 456–463.
65. Ma, H., Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in flowering plants, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2005, vol. 56, pp. 393–434.
66. Feng, X. and Dickinson, H.G., Packaging the male germline in plants, Trends Genet., 2007, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 503–510.
67. Zhao, X., de Palma, J., and Oane, R., et al., OsTDL1A binds to the LRR domain of rice receptor kinase MSP1, and is required to limit sporocyte numbers, Plant J., 2008, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 375–387.
68. Yang, S.-L., Jiang, L., Puah, C.S., et al., Overexpression of TAPETUM DETERMINANT1 alters the cell fates in the Arabidopsis carpel and tapetum via genetic interaction with EXCESS MICROSPOROCYTES1/ EXTRA SPOROGENOUS CELLS, Plant Physiol., 2005, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 186–191.
69. Canales, C., Bhatt, A.M., Scott, R., et al., EXS, a putative LRR receptor kinase, regulates male germline cell number and tapetal identity and promotes seed development in Arabidopsis, Curr. Biol., 2002, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1718–1727.
70. Zhao, D.Z., Wang, G.F., Speal, B., et al., The EXCESS MICROSPOROCYTES1 gene encodes a putative leucine-rich repeat receptor protein kinase that controls somatic and reproductive cell fates in the Arabidopsis anther, Genes Dev., 2002, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 2021–2031.
71. Sorensen, A.-M., Krober, S., Unte, U.S., et al., The Arabidopsis ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS) gene encodes a MYC class transcription factor, Plant J., 2003, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 413–423.
72. Wilson, Z.A., Morroll, S.M., Dawson, J., et al., The Arabidopsis MALE STERILITY1 (MS1) gene is a transcriptional regulator of male gametogenesis, with homology to the PHD-finger family of transcription factors, Plant J., 2001, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–39.
73. Higginson, T., Li, S.F., Parish, R.W., AtMYB103 regulates tapetum and trichome development in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J., 2003, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 177–192.
74. Holmes, R.J. and Cohen, P.E., Small RNAs and RNAi pathways in meiotic prophase I, Chromosome Res., 2007, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 653–665.
75. Golubovskaya, I.N., Grebennikova, Z.K., and Avalkina, N.A., Novel mei gene allele ameiotic 1 (am1) in maize and the problem of genetic control of meiosis initiation in higher plants, Genetika (Moscow), 1992, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 137–146.
76. Siddiqi, I., Ganesh, G., Grossniklaus, U., et al., The dyad gene is required for progression through female meiosis in Arabidopsis, Development, 2000, vol. 127, pp. 197–207.
77. Azumi, Y., Liu, D., Zhao, D., et al., Homolog interaction during meiotic prophase I in Arabidopsis requires the SOLO DANCERS gene encoding a novel cyclin-like protein, EMBO J., 2002, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3081–3095.
78. Stevens, R., Grelon, M., Vezon, D., et al., A CDC45 homolog in Arabidopsis is essential for meiosis, as shown by RNA interference-induced gene silencing, Plant Cell, 2004, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–113.
79. Wang, Y., Magnard, J.-L., McCormick, S., et al., Progression through meiosis I and meiosis II in Arabidopsis anthers is regulated by an A-type cyclin predominately expressed in prophase I, Plant Physiol., 2004, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 4127–4135.
80. Kaur, J., Sebastian, J., and Siddiqi, I., The Arabidopsis- mei2-like genes play a role in meiosis and vegetative growth in Arabidopsis, Plant Cell, 2006, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 545–559.
81. Strich, R., Meiotic DNA replication, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 2004, vol. 61, pp. 29–60.
82. Haering, C.H., Lowe, J., Hochwagen, A., et al., Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex, Mol. Cell, 2002, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 773–788.
83. Ishiguro, K. and Watanabe, Y., Chromosome cohesion in mitosis and meiosis, J. Cell Sci., 2007, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 367–369.
84. Bai, X., Peirson, B.N., Dong, F., et al., Isolation and characterization of SYN1, a RAD21-like gene essential for meiosis in Arabidopsis, Plant Cell, 1999, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 417–430.
85. Cai, X., Dong, F., Edelmann, R.E., et al., The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesin protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing, J. Cell Sci., 2003, vol. 116, pp. 2999–3007.
86. Chelysheva, L., Diallo, S., Vezon, D., et al., AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis, J. Cell Sci., 2005, vol. 118, no. 20, pp. 4621–4632.
87. Hirano, T., Condensins: universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions, Genes Dev., 2012, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 1659–1678.
88. Mainiero, S. and Pawlowski, W.P., Meiotic chromosome structure and function in plants, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2014, vol. 143, nos. 1–3, pp. 6–17.
89. Fedotova, Yu.S., Gadzhieva, S.A., and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Expression at the ultrastructural level of the meiotic mutation mei10 compact chromosomes in rye plants, Dokl. Akad. Nauk., 1995, vol. 243, no. 4, pp. 570–572.
90. Mikhailova, E.I., Tolkacheva, A.V., Mal’tseva, A.L., et al., A search for meiosis-specific proteins in rye Secale cereale L. and mutants of the Peterhof genetic collection, Khromosoma 2015 (Chromosome 2015) (Proc. Int. Conf.), Novosibirsk, 2015.
91. Bhatt, A.M., Canales, C., and Dickinson, H.G., Plant meiosis: the means to in, Trends Plant Sci., 2001, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 114–121.
92. Anderson, L.K. and Stack, S.M., Recombination nodules in plants, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2005, vol. 109. nos. 1–3, pp. 198–204.
93. Grelon, M., Vezon, D., Gendrot, G., et al., AtSPO11-1 is necessary for efficient meiotic recombination in plants, EMBO J., 2001, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 589–600.
94. Hartung, F. and Puchta, H., Molecular characterization of homologues of both subunits A (SPO11) and B of the archaebacterial topoisomerase 6 in plants, Gene, 2001, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 81–86.
95. Stacey, N.J., Kuromori, T., Azumi, Y., et al., Arabidopsis SPO11-2 functions with SPO11-1 in meiotic recombination, Plant J., 2006, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 206–216.
96. Keeney, S., Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 2001, vol. 52, pp. 1–53.
97. Jolivet, S., Vezon, D., Froger, N., et al., Non conservation of the meiotic function of the Ski8/Rec103 homolog in Arabidopsis, Genes Cells, 2006, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 615–622.
98. De Muyt, A., Vezon, D., Gendrot, G., et al., AtPRD1 is required for meiotic double strand break formation in Arabidopsis thaliana, EMBO J., 2007, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 4126–4137.
99. Borde, V., The multiple roles of the Mre11 complex for meiotic recombination, Chromosome Res., 2007, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 551–563.
100. Puizina, J., Siroky, J., Mokros, P., et al., Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis, Plant Cell,

2004, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1968–1978. 101. Bleuyard, J.-Y., Gallego, M.E., and White, C.I., Meiotic defects in the Arabidopsis rad50 mutant point to conservation of the MRX complex function in early stages of meiotic recombination, Chromosoma, 2004, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 197–203.

102. Shinohara, A. and Shinohara, M., Roles of RecA homologues Rad51 and Dmc1 during meiotic recombination, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2004, vol. 107, nos. 3–4, pp. 201–207.
103. Rey, M.-D., Calderon, M.C., and Prieto, P., The use of the ph1b mutant to induce recombination between the chromosomes of wheat and barley, Front. Plant Sci., 2015, vol. 6:160. doi 10.3389/fpls.2015.00160
104. Li, J., Harper, L.C., Golubovskaya, I., et al., Functional analysis of maize RAD51 in meiosis and doublestrand break repair, Genetics, 2007, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 1469–1482.
105. Li, W., Chen, C., Markmann-Mulisch, U., et al., The Arabidopsis AtRAD51 gene is dispensable for vegetative development but required for meiosis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2004, vol. 101, no. 29, pp. 10596–10601.
106. Couteau, F., Belzile, F., Horlow, C., et al., Random chromosome segregation without meiotic arrest in both male and female meiocytes of a dmc1 mutant of Arabidopsis, Plant Cell, 1999, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1623–1634.
107. Siaud, N., Dray, E., Gy, I., et al., Brca2 is involved in meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana as suggested by its interaction with Dmc1, EMBO J., 2004, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1392–1401.
108. Kerzendorfer, C., Vignard, J., Pedrosa-Harand, A., et al., The Arabidopsis thaliana MND1 homologue plays a key role in meiotic homologous pairing, synapsis and recombination, J. Cell Sci., 2006, vol. 119, pp. 2486–2496.
109. Mezard, C., Vignard, J., Drouaud, J., et al., The road to crossovers: plants have their say, Trends Genet., 2007, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 91–99.
110. Lynn, A., Soucek, R., and Borner, G.V., ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work, Chromosome Res., 2007, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 591–605.
111. Copenhaver, G.P., Housworth, E.A., and Stahl, F.W., Crossover interference in Arabidopsis, Genetics, 2002, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 1631–1639.
112. Hartung, F., Suer, S., Bergmann, T., et al., The role of AtMUS81 in DNA repair and its genetic interaction with the helicase AtRecQ4A, Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 4438–4448.
113. Berchowitz, L.E., Francis, K.E., Bey, A.L., et al., The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in A. thaliana, PLoS Genet., 2007, vol. 3, no. 8.
114. Anderson, L.K., Lohmiller, L.D., Tang, X., et al., Combined fluorescent and electron microscopic imaging unveils the specific properties of two classes of meiotic crossovers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2014, vol. 111, no. 37, pp. 13415–13420.
115. Franklin, A.E., McElver, J., Sunjevaric, I., et al., Three-dimensional microscopy of the Rad51 recombination protein during meiotic prophase, Plant Cell, 1999, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 809–824.
116. Bass, H.W., Bordoli, S.J., and Foss, E.M., The desynaptic (dy) and desynaptic1 (dsy1) mutations in maize (Zea mays L.) cause distinct telomere-misplacement phenotypes during meiotic prophase, J. Exp. Bot., 2003, vol. 54, no. 380, pp. 39–46.
117. Loidl, J., The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view, Genome, 1990, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 759–778.
118. Caryl, A.P., Armstrong, S.J., Jones, G.H., et al., A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1, Chromosoma, 2000, vol. 109, nos. 1–2, pp. 62–71.
119. Hollingsworth, N.M., Goetsch, L., and Byers, B., The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes, Cell, 1990, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 73–84.
120. Zetka, M.C., Kawasaki, I., Strome, S., et al., Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation, Genes Dev., 1999, vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 2258–2270.
121. Grishaeva, T.M. and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Conservation and variability of synaptonemal complex proteins in phylogenesis of eukaryotes, Int. J. Evol. Biol., 2014:856230.
122. Lee, D.V., Kao, Y., Ku, J., et al., The axial element protein DESYNAPTIC2 mediates meiotic doublestrand break formation and synaptonemal complex assembly in maize, Plant Cell, 2015, vol. 27, pp. 2516–2529.
123. Borner, G.V., Kleckner, N., and Hunter, N., Crossover/ noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis, Cell, 2004, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 29–45.
124. Yang, M., Hu, Y., Lodhi, M., et al., The Arabidopsis SKP1-LIKE1 gene is essential for male meiosis and may control homologue separation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1999, vol. 96, no. 20, pp. 11416–11421.
125. Cromer, L., Jolivet, S., Horlow, C., et al., Centromeric cohesion is protected twice at meiosis, by SHUGOSHINs

at anaphase I and by PATRONUS at interkinesis, Curr. Biol., 2013, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2090–2099.

126. D’Erfurth, I., Jolivet, S., Froger, N., et al., Turning meiosis into mitosis, PLoS Biol., 2009, vol. 7, no. 6. e1000124
127. Mieulet, D., Jolivet, S., Rivard, M., et al., Turning rice meiosis into mitosis, Cell Res., 2016, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1242–1254.
128. Lambing, C., Franklin, F.C.H., and Wang, C.-J.R., Understanding and manipulating meiotic recombination in plants, Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 1530–1542.
129. Bogdanov, Yu.F., Variation and evolution of meiosis, Russ. J. Genet., 2003, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023345311889.
130. Zhou, A. and Pawlowski, W.P., Regulation of meiotic gene expression in plants, Front. Plant Sci., 2014, vol. 5.
131. Stassen, N.Y., Logsdon, J.M., Vora, G.J., et al., Isolation and characterization of rad51 orthologs from Coprinus cinereus and Lycopersicon esculentum, and phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic recA homologs, Curr. Genet., 1997, vol. 31, pp. 144–157.
132. Grishaeva, T.M. and Bogdanov, Yu.F., Evolutionary conservation of recombination proteins and variability of meiosis-specific proteins of chromosomes, Russ. J. Genet., 2017, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417040081.